A Green rant

719 days ago

“Green,” as anyone with a modicum of cash knows by now, is one of the latest big consumer crazes. It’s been around for a couple of years, but it seems to be growing: you can purchase books on how to eat green, live green, renovate green, and of course, there are a bijillion “green” baby products, from books that advise you to buy used clothes and furniture (wow, authors! thanks for that! I couldn’t have come up with that without purchasing your large book printed on paper!) to organic cotton onesies that cost $35 to toys made from recycled plastics and wood pulp to whatever else someone somewhere thinks might satisfy those previously warring impulses to satisfy consumer lust and save the planet.

Today I got a newsletter that contained an article on “how to throw a green party” this summer that would be both fun and kind to “mother earth”. I also watched a video of Phillipe Cousteau talking to Bill Maher about the Gulf Oil spill, as well as learned about the devastating oil spills happening in Nigeria that we never hear about. According to some estimates, as much oil is spilled in Nigeria and the surrounding ocean every year as has been spilled into the Gulf so far.

Meanwhile, my government in Canada has made pompous, ridiculous, and purely rhetorical claims that we have all the regulation we need to permit off-shore drilling in the Arctic (although they didn’t put their money where their mouth was: Chevron will continue with its drilling plans, but it looks like future proposals face a stricter review with increased attention to safety procedures and plans).

What the Gulf disaster highlights to me is the irresponsibility of focusing one’s “green” activities on one’s own, primarily consumer, practices. One simply cannot save the planet by satisfying one’s consumer desire in “responsible” ways. All the locally produced food, organic cotton onesies, car-sharing and freecycling in the world is not going to make a difference in a political climate where for-profit corporations are in charge of monitoring and maintaining their own environmental controls. The world’s environmental crisis cannot be broken down and addressed by the uncoordinated actions of individuals. This is a political problem. It is a world-wide political problem, and it requires work, solidarity, and the courage to stand up to those who would dismiss us as anti-business or distract us with (admittedly, often gorgeous and highly desirable) “green” consumer goods. It requires us to demand that our government start regulating the environment as though citizens and not corporations were their priority.

If you want to have a “green” party this summer, make it a letter writing campaign. Demand, for example, that the government consider an oil company’s safety record at every single drilling site before granting drilling licenses. Or find organizations that are lobbying for tighter environmental controls and see what you can do to help. Get a group together to do break down the intimidating amount of research that is necessary for informed political action, so that it isn’t just you doing your thing and me doing my thing.

Whatever you do or don’t do, make no mistake. If you want to “go green”, you must “go political”.

Filed under:

Comment [5]

[divider]

A return, of sorts.

719 days ago

It’s been almost a year. 277 days, my last post tells me. I got caught up in my book proposal, which came together very nicely (although it did not win), and then, as pretty much anyone who actually reads this blog will know, I got pregnant. First trimester symptoms with an intestinal parasite to boot, plus commuting by Greyhound to a city not actually served by Greyhound took it’s toll, and there you are.

So now I’m about 8 months pregnant, and I’m on leave and bored, and so ranting (um… blogging, ya) seems like a way to pass the time. I don’t promise I’ll keep it up more than I ever do, but we’ll see how it goes.

Filed under:

Comment [2]

[divider]

40

996 days ago

Today marks the day I have completed 40 thesis tasks.

I have to say, although sometimes I feel down or overwhelmed by this project, and sometimes I just don’t know what to say, daily writing is becoming a habit and it is becoming easier.

Take Tuesday. On Monday I read this. Yikes! Intimidating! Tuesday I felt hopeless about putting together a workable proposal by October 1st. I hemmed and hawed for most of the morning, then called a friend and told her I was giving up, and since I was I might as well enjoy it, was she doing anything? And she told me she was taking her kids swimming in half an hour. Okay, I said, I’ll work for half an hour.

Somehow, having decided to do no work and then having that half hour window to fill was just what I needed. I did a little bit of editing. I hammered together two separate things that I thought would never go together, and they kind of worked. I felt better. Then I went swimming.

On Wednesday, I got over the hump of feeling intimidated and things really started to come together. Thursday was a bit of a rough start again, but I find myself wanting to get a little writing out everyday, which is like a gift. It makes everything so much easier to deal with. And that is the result, totally, of doing a little bit every day. It’s less intimidating, less frustrating, and one’s mind gets accustomed to maintaining a flow from day to day.

Something that I have found very helpful is closing out each day’s work with a bit of a question for the next day’s freewrite. A question or topic makes the freewrite more focused; setting that question or topic the day before gets your subconscious mind working on it so there’s something there to write.

Filed under:

Comment [2]

[divider]

Wait. Start early, before you're ready. But wait.

1003 days ago

There is a seeming contradiction in Boice’s advice for writers. It’s hard to figure out how to wait and start early. I mean, I read what he says and it all seems to make sense, but figuring out how that is going to look in my own writing practice is a bit difficult. And I realized the other day that, done a certain way, free writing could end up adding a lot of slightly random notes to the already huge pile of same generated by fieldwork. Daunting!!

But today I had a pretty successful experience with waiting and starting early, so I thought I’d recount it for any out there who are wondering about Boice’s techniques (or for those of you who are specifically and utterly interested by my writing practice. There’s hundreds, nay, thousands of you aren’t there?).

I got up early and did a little bit of stretchy/breathy stuff to get the blood flowing. Then I plopped myself in front of the laptop to try to focus on a free writing session. I’ve been working on a proposal-style thesis outline that my advisor has set as a task for me, but I was not really able to get going this morning. I felt frustrated. I felt dubious that squeezing these words out of myself when I don’t know what to say is a worthwhile exercise.

So I decided to take a step back from the more linear prose thing I was trying to do, and just set myself to a task that isn’t exactly writing: I sat down on my reading chair with my notebook and just started making notes about what authors I plan to cite in which chapters. Now, this is already something I have a fairly clear idea of, and I wasn’t making any notes about how I was going to cite them. The notes look like this:

Ch. 1 -not much need. Maybe find some cross-cult. anth.

Ch. 2 -Fortes. McCaskie. Oppong. Clark. Maybe more general kinship

Ch. 3. -Rattray, Fortes, McCaskie, Wilks. GLR (Ghana Law Review). Law writers.

Ch. 4 (Funerals) DeWitt. Fortes. Some ritual-related stuff. Inheritance: more Fortes.

My general thinking in doing this was a) at least I’m doing something and b) this will help me make a library list.

But then something neat happened. I had a thought, a pretty simple thought: in order to get a handle on my book proposal, I have to answer a simple question: Why is inheritance an important and interesting thing to look at?

I started making notes on this question, and there it was, my freewriting. Then I had an idea about how to approach the answer in a way that links what I’m writing about to what my potential non-specialist audience and I almost rushed back to my computer to start writing it with the snappy first sentence I had in my head. I could feel the shape of what I wanted to say, and I was eager to begin getting it out.

But then I decided to employ the “wait” part of writing. Instead of trying to spell everything out linearly, I made a few structural notes, first this point then that point stuff. Then I took a break, during which time I told some friends (B. and R.) about it on gchat. B. asked a question that prompted a pretty linear response, so when I was done with my break, I took my outline and my gchat conversation and started writing something linear.

On my next break I showed the rough draft to B. and an anthro friend A. They gave me some feedback that showed where I could fill in some more detail. I was going to rewrite immediately, but I noticed two things that made me reassess:

First, I had been happy and mildly excited throughout the initial two writing sessions, but I was getting much more attached and heading into the euphoric writing state that Boice argues (convincingly) for avoiding. I was also having a harder time focusing, concentrating, and figuring out what I was going to say. Diminishing returns were about to set in!

So, instead of writing, I summarized my two friends’ suggestions in my notebook with a note to make those the subject of tomorrow’s freewrite. Then I finished up my work day by transcribing an interview (which gave me more to think about for tomorrow’s work).

Today I managed to employ several of Boice’s suggestions: wait, start early, monitor attachments, and stop. Oh, and “let others do some of the work” (in this case by getting really early feedback). I’m quite satisfied with what I’ve accomplished today, and I’ve left myself with a clear starting point for tomorrow. I’m happily (and mostly calmly) anticipating tomorrow’s writing session, which is maybe the biggest boon of all.

Filed under:

Comment [1]

[divider]

ABD, baby

1003 days ago

I have finally achieved candidacy for my PhD.

Because my field language is not taught in Canada (as far as I could tell when I was looking for courses), I had to learn it in the field and then do my language test when I got home. That language test was today, and I passed with flying colours. Yay! That changes my status from “enrolled in a PhD program” to “candidate,” which is an important transition (if I hadn’t made it by the end of the month, I would have had to change my status to unenrolled, unemployed). That change in status also means that if I don’t finish my thesis for whatever reason, I can actually still get a degree (it would be called an MPhil).

Now to update my C.V. and go to bed.

Filed under:

Comment [4]

[divider]

Older